Last updated: October 2, 2026
Magic Bloom DIY focuses on floral DIY projects, flower crafts, pressed and dried flowers, botanical home décor, easy projects, and seasonal crafts. This policy describes the editorial principles we aim to follow as the site’s creative library grows.
Who contributes
- Emma Rose Bennett is the founder and floral DIY designer. Her stated creative focus includes pressed flowers, botanical crafts, floral décor, flower preservation, and nature-inspired projects.
- Olivia Green is a botanical craft contributor focused on dried flowers, wildflower crafts, natural materials, and botanical keepsakes.
- Charlotte Rose is the floral gift and décor writer, with a focus on handmade floral gifts, wreaths, centerpieces, and seasonal flower decorations.
Our About page introduces the site and creative team. Author profiles provide context for a contributor’s area of focus. A role or biography is not a claim of a professional qualification or evidence that every project has been physically tested.
Choosing and explaining projects
We aim to select topics that keep flowers and botanical materials central and give readers a useful creative starting point. Guides should make the intended project, relevant materials, main steps, and meaningful variations understandable. Important limitations should be explained alongside the instruction they affect.
Natural materials vary. Where a result depends on flower condition, drying method, supplies, or tools, the guidance should make room for that variation rather than promise an identical outcome.
Research, sources, and attribution
Our standard is to distinguish a creative suggestion from a factual claim that needs support. When guidance relies on a manufacturer’s instruction, preservation technique, or external resource, the relevant source should be identified where it helps a reader assess or follow the advice.
Ideas inspired by another maker should receive appropriate credit and a link where available. Crediting a source does not replace obtaining permission when permission is required. We aim to distinguish our own wording and materials from third-party contributions.
Experience and image standards
A guide should identify hands-on testing or first-hand observations only when that work actually occurred. We do not represent every idea, technique, or project as personally tested or professionally reviewed.
Images should help explain the project and have appropriate usage rights and descriptive alternative text where useful. An inspiration image should not be presented as documentary proof of a result. Illustrative or generated imagery, if used, should be identified when that distinction affects a reader’s understanding. This principle does not assert that a particular tool is part of the current workflow.
Corrections and updates
Readers can report an error, missing source, unclear step, or attribution concern through our Contact page. Include the page link and the detail that needs attention so it can be located.
Our aim is to correct material errors and clarify instructions when an issue is identified. A significant correction should be explained where useful. An update date should reflect a real revision; it should not be used to imply new testing or review that did not occur. We do not promise a fixed review schedule or an expert review of every page.
Commercial transparency
Commercial relationships should be clearly disclosed in the content they affect. Our standard is to keep practical guidance and attribution clear regardless of whether a commercial link is present. The Affiliate Disclosure explains that policy without claiming membership in an unverified program.
Using our guides
Use your own judgment, select suitable supplies, and follow manufacturer directions. Our Website Disclaimer explains the limits of craft guidance. Feedback about clarity, accessibility, and useful project details is welcome.
